Book's Web Site |
I will admit I have grown somewhat weary of vampires, werewolves and zombies. They are just too many novels, movies and TV shows about these creatures, same as I am a bit tired of doctors, cops and lawyers when it comes to TV.
This said,
I believe The Walking Dead is the
best show on TV right now, and I love Dracula
and the first three Anne Rice vampire books and the original version of The Wolfman. So, while I still think
there’s a glut on these creatures I am open-minded.
When Hugh
Sterbakov offered me a review copy of City
under the Moon, once the initial sigh of “it’s a werewolf novel” was over,
I read his synopsis and could tell right away it was something different and
likely special as well.
“During two
years of meticulous research, I worked with a USC virologist, several
physicists, an FBI agent, a USMC sniper, and an Army helicopter pilot and
retired colonel to realistically dramatize the horror unfolding at the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, the White House war rooms, FBI strategy
centers and on the streets of Manhattan.”
This got my attention and was the
final element that broke down my resistance to give this particular “werewolf
novel” a try—and I am glad I did.
Here is Sterbakov’s own plot summary:
A werewolf epidemic tears through Manhattan, unleashed as a form of bioterrorism. It spreads exponentially with each rise of the moon, testing the might of our armed forces and pushing the government to prepare a dire solution. The madman behind it has only one demand: Find a cure.
While all the characters are interesting, I find the use of Lon particularly useful to add a unique twist to the story. Getting the impressions of an actual “werewolf event” from the POV of a kind of geeky fanboy is a smart move on Sternakov’s part.
This is a page turner with great characters, lots of action and a satisfying conclusion. Also, the research shows—it is all the more frightening because you believe the events are possible. It’s kind of like a Michael Crichton thriller crossed with the great characterizations of Stephen King, but that is just a comparison. It is not derivative—Sterbakov has his own unique voice.
No comments:
Post a Comment